There's a proposed measure to strengthen ND's animal cruelty law where the text specifically states that it only includes cruelty toward dogs, cats and horses. It also states that it doesn't pertain to agricultural practices. How does Katie Pinke with the ND Dept of Agriculture interpret this to mean that, if passed, it will ultimately end agriculture? This state needs stronger animal cruelty laws. If the ag people aren't doing anything wrong then they have nothing to worry about. And if they are then...oh wait...they still have nothing to worry about. What's the problem then? Really, I don't get it.
Link to article/video on WDAY News in Fargo.
No comments:
Post a Comment